Stirling’s Approximation

While defining the Gibbs entropy, I quoted an equation called Stirling’s approximation, which says that

\ln n!\approx n\ln n-n

if n is a large number. In this post we’ll discover where this equation comes from.


Unfortunately, the method I’m about to show you uses another equation which completely eclipses the result in beauty. It is

\displaystyle n!=\int_0^\infty x^n e^{-x} dx

This expression warrants a discussion of its own, but for now we’ll take it as read. If this equation is unfamiliar to you, take a look at the Gamma function.

The Stirling approximation can be derived by approximating the integrand in the equation above. For shorthand, we’ll name it little gamma:

\gamma (x)=x^n e^{-x}

Before we decide how to approximate this function, let’s work out what it looks like. First of all, we see that

\gamma (0)=\gamma (\infty) = 0

That is, the integrand vanishes at the limits of integration. Why is this? That \gamma goes to 0 at the origin is clear enough, since

\gamma (0) = 0^n\cdot e^0=0\cdot 1 = 0

What about as x tends to infinity? Although x^n blows up quickly, it doesn’t do so quick enough to counteract the crushing force of e^{-x}. The limit

\displaystyle \gamma (\infty)=\lim_{x\to\infty}\Bigg(\frac{x^n}{e^x}\Bigg)

can be formally calculated in a number of ways, the most convincing of which uses l’Hôpital’s rule.

So \gamma starts and ‘ends’ at zero. How does it behave in-between? Let’s look at its derivative:

\displaystyle \frac{d\gamma}{dx}=\frac{d}{dx}(x^n e^{-x})

\displaystyle \frac{d\gamma}{dx}=\frac{d}{dx}(x^n)e^{-x}+x^n\frac{d}{dx}(e^{-x})

\displaystyle \frac{d\gamma}{dx}=nx^{n-1}e^{-x}-x^n e^{-x}

\displaystyle \frac{d\gamma}{dx}=(n-x)x^{n-1} e^{-x}

Note that, like \gamma itself, the gradient of \gamma goes to zero at the limits of integration. More importantly, the first factor tells us that

\displaystyle \frac{d\gamma(n)}{dx}=0

That is, the function has an extremum (which must be a maximum since \gamma \ge 0 for x \ge 0) at x=n. Using what we’ve learnt, we can draw a fairly comprehensive sketch of \gamma. The diagram below shows sketches of \gamma for n=2,3,4.


The diagram above shows that it would be a good idea to approximate \gamma(x) about the point x=n. We want our expansion of \gamma to be most accurate around its maximum, so that we don’t lose a significant amount of its area when we finally integrate it. With this in mind, let’s write x in the form


The new independent variable \zeta measures how far to the left or right of \gamma‘s maximum we are. So now we have

\gamma=(n+\zeta)^n e^{-(n+\zeta)}

There are far too many powers going on here, so let’s temporarily work with the natural logarithm of \gamma:

\ln\gamma=\ln[(n+\zeta)^n e^{-(n+\zeta)}]

\ln\gamma=\ln(n+\zeta)^n+\ln e^{-(n+\zeta)}

\ln\gamma = n\ln(n+\zeta)-(n+\zeta)

We’re now going to Taylor expand the logarithm on the right-hand side using the equation

\ln(1+x)\approx x-\frac{1}{2}x^2

which is most accurate for small x. To get the logarithm into this form, we’re going to take out a ‘factor’ of n:

\displaystyle \ln\gamma=n\ln\Big(n\Big[1+\frac{\zeta}{n}\Big]\Big)-(n+\zeta)

\displaystyle \ln\gamma=n\ln n+n\ln\Big(1+\frac{\zeta}{n}\Big)-(n+\zeta)

We can now use the Taylor expansion because in the area around \gamma‘s maximum, n is larger than \zeta, hence \frac{\zeta}{n} is ‘small’. So

\displaystyle \ln\gamma\approx n\ln n+n\Big(\frac{\zeta}{n}-\frac{\zeta^2}{2n^2}\Big)-(n+\zeta)

\displaystyle \ln\gamma\approx n\ln n-n-\frac{\zeta^2}{2n^2}

Exponentiating both sides, we find

\displaystyle \gamma=n^n e^{-n} e^{-\frac{\zeta^2}{2n}}

\displaystyle \gamma(x)\approx n^n e^{-n} \exp\Bigg({-\frac{(x-n)^2}{2n}}\Bigg)

So approximately, the integrand is a Gaussian. The diagram below compares our approximation of \gamma to its exact shape for n=15, the former show in brown and the latter in gold.

gamma approximation

Not too bad!

Let’s reconsider the equation for n! given above:

\displaystyle n!=\int_0^\infty x^n e^{-x} dx

Using our expression for the integrand \gamma,

\displaystyle n!\approx n^n e^{-n}\int_{-n}^\infty e^{-\frac{\zeta^2}{2n}}d\zeta

Note that the lower limit of integration has changed, since we’re using the new variable \zeta which is equal to -n when x is zero. One last approximation: we’ve demanded that n is ‘large’, so we’ll extend the lower limit of integration to negative infinity. This doesn’t hurt too much, since the integrand \gamma has all but vanished by the time \zeta reaches -n, so the additional area that will be included is only small. So,

\displaystyle n!\approx n^n e^{-n}\int_{-\infty}^\infty e^{-\frac{\zeta^2}{2n}}d\zeta

The integral is a ‘standard’ one, and evaluation gives

n!\approx n^n e^{-n} \sqrt{2\pi n}

Finally, we take the logarithm of both sides:

\ln n!\approx n\ln n-n+\frac{1}{2}\ln 2\pi n

This method actually gives us an additional term on order of the logarithm of n. This term is often omitted since it increases much more slowly than either n or nln(x) as n increases. Doing so yields the desired result

\ln n!\approx n\ln n - n

Test how good Stirling’s approximation is for a few values of n for yourself. If you want to check really big values of n you’ll have to use something powerful like Mathematica – most handheld calculators conk out at 69!, and both Google and Excel can’t handle anything bigger than 170!.

Return to top


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s